1999 Nissan C 52 vs. 2010 Nissan NP300
To start off, 2010 Nissan NP300 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Nissan C 52. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Nissan C 52 would be higher. At 3,496 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Nissan C 52 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Nissan C 52 (152 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 11 more horse power than 2010 Nissan NP300. (141 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Nissan C 52 should accelerate faster than 2010 Nissan NP300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Nissan NP300 weights approximately 176 kg more than 1999 Nissan C 52.
Let's talk about torque, 1999 Nissan C 52 (354 Nm) has 149 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Nissan NP300. (205 Nm). This means 1999 Nissan C 52 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Nissan NP300. 1999 Nissan C 52 has automatic transmission and 2010 Nissan NP300 has manual transmission. 2010 Nissan NP300 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1999 Nissan C 52 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Nissan C 52 | 2010 Nissan NP300 | |
| Make | Nissan | Nissan |
| Model | C 52 | NP300 |
| Year Released | 1999 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 3496 cc | 2389 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 152 HP | 141 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 354 Nm | 205 Nm |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 1 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1266 kg | 1442 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2960 mm |
