1999 Nissan C 52 vs. 2012 Chevrolet Malibu
To start off, 2012 Chevrolet Malibu is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Nissan C 52. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Nissan C 52 would be higher. At 3,496 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Nissan C 52 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Chevrolet Malibu (252 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 100 more horse power than 1999 Nissan C 52. (152 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Chevrolet Malibu should accelerate faster than 1999 Nissan C 52.
Let's talk about torque, 1999 Nissan C 52 (354 Nm) has 14 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Chevrolet Malibu. (340 Nm). This means 1999 Nissan C 52 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Chevrolet Malibu.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Nissan C 52 | 2012 Chevrolet Malibu | |
Make | Nissan | Chevrolet |
Model | C 52 | Malibu |
Year Released | 1999 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 3496 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 152 HP | 252 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 6300 RPM |
Torque | 354 Nm | 340 Nm |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
Number of Seats | 1 seats | 5 seats |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2852 mm |