1999 Nissan C 52 vs. 2012 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2012 Ford Mustang is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Nissan C 52. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Nissan C 52 would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Ford Mustang (305 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 153 more horse power than 1999 Nissan C 52. (152 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1999 Nissan C 52. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Ford Mustang weights approximately 300 kg more than 1999 Nissan C 52. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2012 Ford Mustang (379 Nm) has 25 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Nissan C 52. (354 Nm). This means 2012 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Nissan C 52. 1999 Nissan C 52 has automatic transmission and 2012 Ford Mustang has manual transmission. 2012 Ford Mustang will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1999 Nissan C 52 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Nissan C 52 | 2012 Ford Mustang | |
| Make | Nissan | Ford |
| Model | C 52 | Mustang |
| Year Released | 1999 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 3496 cc | 3700 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 152 HP | 305 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Torque | 354 Nm | 379 Nm |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed manual |
| Number of Seats | 1 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1266 kg | 1566 kg |
