1999 Nissan C 52 vs. 2012 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 2012 Toyota 4Runner is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Nissan C 52. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Nissan C 52 would be higher. At 4,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Toyota 4Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Toyota 4Runner (270 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 118 more horse power than 1999 Nissan C 52. (152 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Toyota 4Runner should accelerate faster than 1999 Nissan C 52. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Toyota 4Runner weights approximately 787 kg more than 1999 Nissan C 52. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2012 Toyota 4Runner (376 Nm) has 22 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Nissan C 52. (354 Nm). This means 2012 Toyota 4Runner will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Nissan C 52.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Nissan C 52 | 2012 Toyota 4Runner | |
| Make | Nissan | Toyota |
| Model | C 52 | 4Runner |
| Year Released | 1999 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 3496 cc | 4000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 152 HP | 270 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 354 Nm | 376 Nm |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 1 seats | 7 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1266 kg | 2053 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2789 mm |
