1999 Nissan Cima vs. 1963 Toyota Corona
To start off, 1999 Nissan Cima is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Toyota Corona. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Toyota Corona would be higher. At 2,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Nissan Cima is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Nissan Cima weights approximately 590 kg more than 1963 Toyota Corona.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Nissan Cima | 1963 Toyota Corona | |
Make | Nissan | Toyota |
Model | Cima | Corona |
Year Released | 1999 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2998 cc | 997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 38 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 940 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1500 mm |