1999 Nissan Cima vs. 2006 Volvo C70
To start off, 2006 Volvo C70 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Nissan Cima. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Nissan Cima would be higher. At 2,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Nissan Cima is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Volvo C70 weights approximately 162 kg more than 1999 Nissan Cima.
Because 1999 Nissan Cima is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 Nissan Cima. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Volvo C70, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Nissan Cima | 2006 Volvo C70 | |
Make | Nissan | Volvo |
Model | Cima | C70 |
Year Released | 1999 | 2006 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2998 cc | 2435 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 168 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 1692 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4590 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 190 mm |