1999 Nissan Cima vs. 2009 Volvo S40
To start off, 2009 Volvo S40 is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Nissan Cima. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Nissan Cima would be higher. At 2,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Nissan Cima is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Volvo S40 weights approximately 100 kg more than 1999 Nissan Cima.
Because 2009 Volvo S40 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1999 Nissan Cima. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Volvo S40 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Nissan Cima | 2009 Volvo S40 | |
Make | Nissan | Volvo |
Model | Cima | S40 |
Year Released | 1999 | 2009 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2998 cc | 2521 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 227 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 1630 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1780 mm |