1999 Nissan Cima vs. 2011 Acura TL
To start off, 2011 Acura TL is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Nissan Cima. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Nissan Cima would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Acura TL is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Acura TL weights approximately 158 kg more than 1999 Nissan Cima.
Because 1999 Nissan Cima is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 Nissan Cima. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Acura TL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Nissan Cima | 2011 Acura TL | |
Make | Nissan | Acura |
Model | Cima | TL |
Year Released | 1999 | 2011 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2998 cc | 3500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 280 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 1688 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4966 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1880 mm |