1999 Nissan Cima vs. 2012 Fiat Bravo
To start off, 2012 Fiat Bravo is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Nissan Cima. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Nissan Cima would be higher. At 2,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Nissan Cima is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Nissan Cima weights approximately 174 kg more than 2012 Fiat Bravo.
Because 1999 Nissan Cima is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 Nissan Cima. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Fiat Bravo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Nissan Cima | 2012 Fiat Bravo | |
| Make | Nissan | Fiat |
| Model | Cima | Bravo |
| Year Released | 1999 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2998 cc | 1368 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 148 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 1356 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4340 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1800 mm |
