1999 Nissan Crew vs. 2008 Renault Clio
To start off, 2008 Renault Clio is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Nissan Crew. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Nissan Crew would be higher. At 1,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Nissan Crew is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Nissan Crew weights approximately 255 kg more than 2008 Renault Clio.
Because 1999 Nissan Crew is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 Nissan Crew. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Nissan Crew (175 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 70 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Renault Clio. (105 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1999 Nissan Crew will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Nissan Crew | 2008 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Nissan | Renault |
| Model | Crew | Clio |
| Year Released | 1999 | 2008 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1149 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 129 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 175 Nm | 105 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1240 kg | 985 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4600 mm | 3990 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1730 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1500 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2480 mm |
