1999 Nissan El Grand vs. 2013 Dodge CHARGER
To start off, 2013 Dodge CHARGER is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Nissan El Grand. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Nissan El Grand would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Dodge CHARGER is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Nissan El Grand weights approximately 173 kg more than 2013 Dodge CHARGER.
Because 2013 Dodge CHARGER is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Dodge CHARGER. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Nissan El Grand, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2013 Dodge CHARGER has automatic transmission and 1999 Nissan El Grand has manual transmission. 1999 Nissan El Grand will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Dodge CHARGER will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Nissan El Grand | 2013 Dodge CHARGER | |
Make | Nissan | Dodge |
Model | El Grand | CHARGER |
Year Released | 1999 | 2013 |
Engine Size | 3200 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 288 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | 5-speed automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1970 kg | 1797 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4750 mm | 5077 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1905 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1950 mm | 1482 mm |