1999 Nissan R 391 vs. 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 1999 Nissan R 391 is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 4,997 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Nissan R 391 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Nissan R 391 (152 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 32 more horse power than 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass. (120 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Nissan R 391 should accelerate faster than 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Nissan R 391 (359 Nm) has 54 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass. (305 Nm). This means 1999 Nissan R 391 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Nissan R 391 | 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
| Make | Nissan | Oldsmobile |
| Model | R 391 | Cutlass |
| Year Released | 1999 | 1980 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 4997 cc | 4343 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 152 HP | 120 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Torque | 359 Nm | 305 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 1 seats | 4 seats |
