1999 Nissan R 391 vs. 1990 Ford Telstar
To start off, 1999 Nissan R 391 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Ford Telstar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Ford Telstar would be higher. At 4,997 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Nissan R 391 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Nissan R 391 (152 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 58 more horse power than 1990 Ford Telstar. (94 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Nissan R 391 should accelerate faster than 1990 Ford Telstar.
Because 1999 Nissan R 391 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 Nissan R 391. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Ford Telstar, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Nissan R 391 (359 Nm) has 201 more torque (in Nm) than 1990 Ford Telstar. (158 Nm). This means 1999 Nissan R 391 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1990 Ford Telstar.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Nissan R 391 | 1990 Ford Telstar | |
Make | Nissan | Ford |
Model | R 391 | Telstar |
Year Released | 1999 | 1990 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 4997 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 152 HP | 94 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 359 Nm | 158 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 1 seats | 5 seats |