1999 Nissan R 391 vs. 1996 Honda CR-V
To start off, 1999 Nissan R 391 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Honda CR-V. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Honda CR-V would be higher. At 4,997 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Nissan R 391 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Nissan R 391 (152 HP) has 24 more horse power than 1996 Honda CR-V. (128 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Nissan R 391 should accelerate faster than 1996 Honda CR-V.
Because 1999 Nissan R 391 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 Nissan R 391. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Honda CR-V, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Nissan R 391 (359 Nm) has 179 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Honda CR-V. (180 Nm). This means 1999 Nissan R 391 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Honda CR-V.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Nissan R 391 | 1996 Honda CR-V | |
| Make | Nissan | Honda |
| Model | R 391 | CR-V |
| Year Released | 1999 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 4997 cc | 1999 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 152 HP | 128 HP |
| Torque | 359 Nm | 180 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 1 seats | 5 seats |
