1999 Nissan R 391 vs. 2000 Ford Falcon
To start off, 2000 Ford Falcon is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Nissan R 391. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Nissan R 391 would be higher. At 4,997 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Nissan R 391 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Falcon (220 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 68 more horse power than 1999 Nissan R 391. (152 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 1999 Nissan R 391.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Nissan R 391 (359 Nm) has 2 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford Falcon. (357 Nm). This means 1999 Nissan R 391 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford Falcon.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Nissan R 391 | 2000 Ford Falcon | |
| Make | Nissan | Ford |
| Model | R 391 | Falcon |
| Year Released | 1999 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 4997 cc | 3984 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 152 HP | 220 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 359 Nm | 357 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
