1999 Nissan R 391 vs. 2001 Smart ForFour
To start off, 2001 Smart ForFour is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Nissan R 391. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Nissan R 391 would be higher. At 4,997 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Nissan R 391 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Nissan R 391 (152 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 78 more horse power than 2001 Smart ForFour. (74 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Nissan R 391 should accelerate faster than 2001 Smart ForFour.
Because 1999 Nissan R 391 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 Nissan R 391. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Smart ForFour, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Nissan R 391 (359 Nm) has 259 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Smart ForFour. (100 Nm). This means 1999 Nissan R 391 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Smart ForFour.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Nissan R 391 | 2001 Smart ForFour | |
| Make | Nissan | Smart |
| Model | R 391 | ForFour |
| Year Released | 1999 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 4997 cc | 1124 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 152 HP | 74 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 359 Nm | 100 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 1 seats | 5 seats |
