1999 Nissan R 391 vs. 2010 Cadillac STS
To start off, 2010 Cadillac STS is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Nissan R 391. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Nissan R 391 would be higher. At 4,997 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Nissan R 391 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Cadillac STS (302 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 150 more horse power than 1999 Nissan R 391. (152 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Cadillac STS should accelerate faster than 1999 Nissan R 391.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Cadillac STS (368 Nm) has 9 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Nissan R 391. (359 Nm). This means 2010 Cadillac STS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Nissan R 391.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Nissan R 391 | 2010 Cadillac STS | |
Make | Nissan | Cadillac |
Model | R 391 | STS |
Year Released | 1999 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 4997 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 152 HP | 302 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 6300 RPM |
Torque | 359 Nm | 368 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 1 seats | 5 seats |