1999 Nissan R 391 vs. 2012 Honda CR-V
To start off, 2012 Honda CR-V is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Nissan R 391. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Nissan R 391 would be higher. At 4,997 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Nissan R 391 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Nissan R 391 (152 HP) has 4 more horse power than 2012 Honda CR-V. (148 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Nissan R 391 should accelerate faster than 2012 Honda CR-V.
Because 1999 Nissan R 391 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 Nissan R 391. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Honda CR-V, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Nissan R 391 (359 Nm) has 9 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Honda CR-V. (350 Nm). This means 1999 Nissan R 391 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Honda CR-V.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Nissan R 391 | 2012 Honda CR-V | |
| Make | Nissan | Honda |
| Model | R 391 | CR-V |
| Year Released | 1999 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 4997 cc | 2199 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 152 HP | 148 HP |
| Torque | 359 Nm | 350 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 1 seats | 5 seats |
