1999 Nissan R 391 vs. 2013 Ford EDGE
To start off, 2013 Ford EDGE is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Nissan R 391. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Nissan R 391 would be higher. At 4,997 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Nissan R 391 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Ford EDGE (281 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 129 more horse power than 1999 Nissan R 391. (152 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Ford EDGE should accelerate faster than 1999 Nissan R 391.
Because 1999 Nissan R 391 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 Nissan R 391. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Ford EDGE, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Nissan R 391 (359 Nm) has 16 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Ford EDGE. (343 Nm). This means 1999 Nissan R 391 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Ford EDGE.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Nissan R 391 | 2013 Ford EDGE | |
| Make | Nissan | Ford |
| Model | R 391 | EDGE |
| Year Released | 1999 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 4997 cc | 3500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 152 HP | 281 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Torque | 359 Nm | 343 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automatic |
| Number of Seats | 1 seats | 5 seats |
