1999 Nissan SUT vs. 2000 Volvo S60
To start off, 2000 Volvo S60 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Nissan SUT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Nissan SUT would be higher. At 3,299 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Nissan SUT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Nissan SUT (140 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 2000 Volvo S60. (138 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Nissan SUT should accelerate faster than 2000 Volvo S60.
Because 1999 Nissan SUT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Volvo S60. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Nissan SUT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Nissan SUT (372 Nm) has 152 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Volvo S60. (220 Nm). This means 1999 Nissan SUT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Volvo S60. 1999 Nissan SUT has automatic transmission and 2000 Volvo S60 has manual transmission. 2000 Volvo S60 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1999 Nissan SUT will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Nissan SUT | 2000 Volvo S60 | |
| Make | Nissan | Volvo |
| Model | SUT | S60 |
| Year Released | 1999 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3299 cc | 2434 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 140 HP | 138 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Torque | 372 Nm | 220 Nm |
| Top Speed | 210 km/hour | 210 km/hour |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
