1999 Nissan SUT vs. 2005 Rover 75
To start off, 2005 Rover 75 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Nissan SUT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Nissan SUT would be higher. At 3,299 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Nissan SUT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Rover 75 (175 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 35 more horse power than 1999 Nissan SUT. (140 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Rover 75 should accelerate faster than 1999 Nissan SUT.
Because 1999 Nissan SUT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Rover 75. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Nissan SUT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Nissan SUT (372 Nm) has 132 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Rover 75. (240 Nm). This means 1999 Nissan SUT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Rover 75. 1999 Nissan SUT has automatic transmission and 2005 Rover 75 has manual transmission. 2005 Rover 75 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1999 Nissan SUT will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Nissan SUT | 2005 Rover 75 | |
Make | Nissan | Rover |
Model | SUT | 75 |
Year Released | 1999 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3299 cc | 2495 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 140 HP | 175 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 372 Nm | 240 Nm |
Top Speed | 210 km/hour | 220 km/hour |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |