1999 Nissan X-Trail vs. 1981 Volvo 240
To start off, 1999 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Volvo 240. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Volvo 240 would be higher. At 2,127 cc (4 cylinders), 1981 Volvo 240 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Nissan X-Trail (146 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 50 more horse power than 1981 Volvo 240. (96 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Nissan X-Trail should accelerate faster than 1981 Volvo 240.
Because 1999 Nissan X-Trail is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1981 Volvo 240. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Nissan X-Trail will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Nissan X-Trail (136 Nm) has 9 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Volvo 240. (127 Nm). This means 1999 Nissan X-Trail will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Volvo 240.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Nissan X-Trail | 1981 Volvo 240 | |
Make | Nissan | Volvo |
Model | X-Trail | 240 |
Year Released | 1999 | 1981 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 2127 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 146 HP | 96 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 136 Nm | 127 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4520 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1680 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2660 mm |