1999 Nissan XVL vs. 2002 Renault Clio

To start off, 2002 Renault Clio is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Nissan XVL. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Nissan XVL would be higher. At 2,953 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Nissan XVL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Nissan XVL (156 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 78 more horse power than 2002 Renault Clio. (78 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Nissan XVL should accelerate faster than 2002 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Nissan XVL weights approximately 276 kg more than 2002 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Nissan XVL (310 Nm) has 125 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Renault Clio. (185 Nm). This means 1999 Nissan XVL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Renault Clio. 1999 Nissan XVL has automatic transmission and 2002 Renault Clio has manual transmission. 2002 Renault Clio will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1999 Nissan XVL will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: