1999 Nissan XVL vs. 2008 Rover 75
To start off, 2008 Rover 75 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Nissan XVL. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Nissan XVL would be higher. At 2,953 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Nissan XVL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Rover 75 (175 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 19 more horse power than 1999 Nissan XVL. (156 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Rover 75 should accelerate faster than 1999 Nissan XVL. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Rover 75 weights approximately 270 kg more than 1999 Nissan XVL. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Nissan XVL (310 Nm) has 70 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Rover 75. (240 Nm). This means 1999 Nissan XVL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Rover 75.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Nissan XVL | 2008 Rover 75 | |
| Make | Nissan | Rover |
| Model | XVL | 75 |
| Year Released | 1999 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2953 cc | 2497 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 156 HP | 175 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 6250 RPM |
| Torque | 310 Nm | 240 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1260 kg | 1530 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2750 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 65 L |
