1999 Nissan XVL vs. 2010 Jaguar XJ
To start off, 2010 Jaguar XJ is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Nissan XVL. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Nissan XVL would be higher. At 4,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Jaguar XJ (297 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 141 more horse power than 1999 Nissan XVL. (156 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 1999 Nissan XVL.
Because 2010 Jaguar XJ is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Jaguar XJ. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Nissan XVL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, both vehicles can yield 310 Nm of torque. So under normal driving conditions, the ability to climb up hills and pull heavy equipment should be relatively similar for both vehicles.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Nissan XVL | 2010 Jaguar XJ | |
| Make | Nissan | Jaguar |
| Model | XVL | XJ |
| Year Released | 1999 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2953 cc | 4200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 156 HP | 297 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 310 Nm | 310 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 3040 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 85 L |
