1999 Nissan Z vs. 1965 Peugeot 204
To start off, 1999 Nissan Z is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Peugeot 204. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Peugeot 204 would be higher. At 2,389 cc (4 cylinders), 1999 Nissan Z is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Nissan Z (197 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 153 more horse power than 1965 Peugeot 204. (44 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Nissan Z should accelerate faster than 1965 Peugeot 204.
Because 1999 Nissan Z is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 Nissan Z. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1965 Peugeot 204, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Nissan Z (245 Nm @ 5200 RPM) has 173 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Peugeot 204. (72 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1999 Nissan Z will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Peugeot 204.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Nissan Z | 1965 Peugeot 204 | |
| Make | Nissan | Peugeot |
| Model | Z | 204 |
| Year Released | 1999 | 1965 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Station Wagon |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2389 cc | 1255 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 44 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 245 Nm | 72 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 5200 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 3980 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1580 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2600 mm |
