1999 Nissan Z vs. 1992 Holden Commodore
To start off, 1999 Nissan Z is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Holden Commodore. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Holden Commodore would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Nissan Z (197 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 26 more horse power than 1992 Holden Commodore. (171 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Nissan Z should accelerate faster than 1992 Holden Commodore.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Holden Commodore (288 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 43 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Nissan Z. (245 Nm @ 5200 RPM). This means 1992 Holden Commodore will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Nissan Z.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Nissan Z | 1992 Holden Commodore | |
Make | Nissan | Holden |
Model | Z | Commodore |
Year Released | 1999 | 1992 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2389 cc | 3791 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 171 HP |
Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 245 Nm | 288 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5200 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 4900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2740 mm |