1999 Nissan Z vs. 2010 Toyota RAV4
To start off, 2010 Toyota RAV4 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Nissan Z. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Nissan Z would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Toyota RAV4 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Nissan Z (197 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 18 more horse power than 2010 Toyota RAV4. (179 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Nissan Z should accelerate faster than 2010 Toyota RAV4.
Because 1999 Nissan Z is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 Nissan Z. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Toyota RAV4, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Nissan Z (245 Nm @ 5200 RPM) has 12 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Toyota RAV4. (233 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1999 Nissan Z will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Toyota RAV4.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Nissan Z | 2010 Toyota RAV4 | |
Make | Nissan | Toyota |
Model | Z | RAV4 |
Year Released | 1999 | 2010 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2389 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 179 HP |
Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 245 Nm | 233 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 4620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1816 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1684 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2659 mm |