1999 Nissan Z vs. 2011 Saab 05-Sep
To start off, 2011 Saab 05-Sep is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Nissan Z. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Nissan Z would be higher. At 2,800 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Saab 05-Sep is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Saab 05-Sep (300 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 103 more horse power than 1999 Nissan Z. (197 HP @ 6200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Saab 05-Sep should accelerate faster than 1999 Nissan Z.
Because 2011 Saab 05-Sep is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1999 Nissan Z. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Saab 05-Sep will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Saab 05-Sep (400 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 155 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Nissan Z. (245 Nm @ 5200 RPM). This means 2011 Saab 05-Sep will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Nissan Z.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Nissan Z | 2011 Saab 05-Sep | |
| Make | Nissan | Saab |
| Model | Z | 05-Sep |
| Year Released | 1999 | 2011 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2389 cc | 2800 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 300 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 245 Nm | 400 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 5200 RPM | 2000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 5009 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1862 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1468 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2837 mm |
