1999 Noble M10 vs. 1965 Triumph Spitfire
To start off, 1999 Noble M10 is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Triumph Spitfire. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Triumph Spitfire would be higher. At 2,500 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Noble M10 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Noble M10 (168 HP) has 102 more horse power than 1965 Triumph Spitfire. (66 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Noble M10 should accelerate faster than 1965 Triumph Spitfire. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Noble M10 weights approximately 235 kg more than 1965 Triumph Spitfire. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Noble M10 (220 Nm) has 126 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Triumph Spitfire. (94 Nm). This means 1999 Noble M10 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Triumph Spitfire.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Noble M10 | 1965 Triumph Spitfire | |
Make | Noble | Triumph |
Model | M10 | Spitfire |
Year Released | 1999 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 2500 cc | 1147 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 168 HP | 66 HP |
Torque | 220 Nm | 94 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 960 kg | 725 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3870 mm | 3690 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1450 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1170 mm | 1210 mm |