1999 Noble M10 vs. 1982 Suzuki Cervo
To start off, 1999 Noble M10 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Suzuki Cervo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Suzuki Cervo would be higher. At 2,500 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Noble M10 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Noble M10 (168 HP) has 142 more horse power than 1982 Suzuki Cervo. (26 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Noble M10 should accelerate faster than 1982 Suzuki Cervo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Noble M10 weights approximately 425 kg more than 1982 Suzuki Cervo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Noble M10 (220 Nm) has 168 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Suzuki Cervo. (52 Nm). This means 1999 Noble M10 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Suzuki Cervo.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Noble M10 | 1982 Suzuki Cervo | |
Make | Noble | Suzuki |
Model | M10 | Cervo |
Year Released | 1999 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Middle | Rear |
Engine Size | 2500 cc | 538 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 168 HP | 26 HP |
Torque | 220 Nm | 52 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 960 kg | 535 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3870 mm | 3200 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1400 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1170 mm | 1220 mm |