1999 Noble M10 vs. 2005 Renault Megane
To start off, 2005 Renault Megane is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Noble M10. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Noble M10 would be higher. At 2,500 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Noble M10 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Noble M10 (168 HP) has 50 more horse power than 2005 Renault Megane. (118 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Noble M10 should accelerate faster than 2005 Renault Megane. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Renault Megane weights approximately 960 kg more than 1999 Noble M10.
Because 1999 Noble M10 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 Noble M10. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Renault Megane, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Renault Megane (300 Nm) has 80 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Noble M10. (220 Nm). This means 2005 Renault Megane will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Noble M10.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Noble M10 | 2005 Renault Megane | |
| Make | Noble | Renault |
| Model | M10 | Megane |
| Year Released | 1999 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 2500 cc | 1869 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 168 HP | 118 HP |
| Torque | 220 Nm | 300 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 960 kg | 1920 kg |
