1999 Oldsmobile Cutlass vs. 2003 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2003 Ford Ecosport is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 3,135 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Oldsmobile Cutlass (150 HP) has 83 more horse power than 2003 Ford Ecosport. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Oldsmobile Cutlass should accelerate faster than 2003 Ford Ecosport.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1999 Oldsmobile Cutlass has automatic transmission and 2003 Ford Ecosport has manual transmission. 2003 Ford Ecosport will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1999 Oldsmobile Cutlass will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Oldsmobile Cutlass | 2003 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | Oldsmobile | Ford |
Model | Cutlass | Ecosport |
Year Released | 1999 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3135 cc | 1400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 150 HP | 67 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4850 mm | 4228 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2490 mm |