1999 Oldsmobile Cutlass vs. 2009 Volvo S40
To start off, 2009 Volvo S40 is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 3,135 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Oldsmobile Cutlass (150 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 42 more horse power than 2009 Volvo S40. (108 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Oldsmobile Cutlass should accelerate faster than 2009 Volvo S40.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Oldsmobile Cutlass (249 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 8 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Volvo S40. (241 Nm @ 1500 RPM). This means 1999 Oldsmobile Cutlass will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Volvo S40.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Oldsmobile Cutlass | 2009 Volvo S40 | |
Make | Oldsmobile | Volvo |
Model | Cutlass | S40 |
Year Released | 1999 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3135 cc | 1560 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 150 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 249 Nm | 241 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 1500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4850 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 2030 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2650 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 76 L | 70 L |