1999 Oldsmobile LSS vs. 2004 Renault Clio

To start off, 2004 Renault Clio is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Oldsmobile LSS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Oldsmobile LSS would be higher. At 3,784 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Oldsmobile LSS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Oldsmobile LSS (202 HP) has 121 more horse power than 2004 Renault Clio. (81 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Oldsmobile LSS should accelerate faster than 2004 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Oldsmobile LSS weights approximately 553 kg more than 2004 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Oldsmobile LSS (312 Nm) has 121 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Renault Clio. (191 Nm). This means 1999 Oldsmobile LSS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Renault Clio. 1999 Oldsmobile LSS has automatic transmission and 2004 Renault Clio has manual transmission. 2004 Renault Clio will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1999 Oldsmobile LSS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: