1999 Opel Omega vs. 1962 Renault 8
To start off, 1999 Opel Omega is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Renault 8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Renault 8 would be higher. At 2,497 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Opel Omega is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Opel Omega (130 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 83 more horse power than 1962 Renault 8. (47 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Opel Omega should accelerate faster than 1962 Renault 8. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Opel Omega weights approximately 115 kg more than 1962 Renault 8. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Opel Omega | 1962 Renault 8 | |
| Make | Opel | Renault |
| Model | Omega | 8 |
| Year Released | 1999 | 1962 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 2497 cc | 956 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 130 HP | 47 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 855 kg | 740 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4900 mm | 4000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1500 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2280 mm |
