1999 Opel Omega vs. 1963 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1999 Opel Omega is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 2,498 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Triumph 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 130 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Opel Omega weights approximately 480 kg more than 1963 Triumph 2000.
Let's talk about torque, 1999 Opel Omega (250 Nm @ 2200 RPM) has 52 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Triumph 2000. (198 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1999 Opel Omega will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Opel Omega | 1963 Triumph 2000 | |
| Make | Opel | Triumph |
| Model | Omega | 2000 |
| Year Released | 1999 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2497 cc | 2498 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 130 HP | 130 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 250 Nm | 198 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 2000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 80 mm | 74.8 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 82.8 mm | 95 mm |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1675 kg | 1195 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4900 mm | 4420 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2740 mm | 2700 mm |
