1999 Opel Omega vs. 2008 Renault Clio
To start off, 2008 Renault Clio is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Opel Omega. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Opel Omega would be higher. At 2,171 cc (4 cylinders), 1999 Opel Omega is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Opel Omega weights approximately 615 kg more than 2008 Renault Clio.
Because 1999 Opel Omega is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 Opel Omega. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Opel Omega (270 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 143 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Renault Clio. (127 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 1999 Opel Omega will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Opel Omega | 2008 Renault Clio | |
Make | Opel | Renault |
Model | Omega | Clio |
Year Released | 1999 | 2008 |
Engine Size | 2171 cc | 1390 cc |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 270 Nm | 127 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1600 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 84.1 mm | 79.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 98 mm | 70 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 18.5:1 | 10.0:1 |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 12.5 seconds | 10.5 seconds |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1670 kg | 1055 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4900 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2480 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 50 L |