1999 Opel Omega vs. 2008 Renault Clio
To start off, 2008 Renault Clio is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Opel Omega. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Opel Omega would be higher. At 2,962 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Opel Omega is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Opel Omega weights approximately 381 kg more than 2008 Renault Clio.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Renault Clio (301 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 31 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Opel Omega. (270 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2008 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Opel Omega.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Opel Omega | 2008 Renault Clio | |
Make | Opel | Renault |
Model | Omega | Clio |
Year Released | 1999 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 2962 cc | 2946 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 270 Nm | 301 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1716 kg | 1335 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4900 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1950 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2740 mm | 2520 mm |