1999 Opel Omega vs. 2009 Nissan Pixo
To start off, 2009 Nissan Pixo is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Opel Omega. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Opel Omega would be higher. At 2,962 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Opel Omega is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Opel Omega (211 HP) has 143 more horse power than 2009 Nissan Pixo. (68 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Opel Omega should accelerate faster than 2009 Nissan Pixo.
Because 1999 Opel Omega is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 Opel Omega. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Nissan Pixo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Opel Omega | 2009 Nissan Pixo | |
Make | Opel | Nissan |
Model | Omega | Pixo |
Year Released | 1999 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2962 cc | 996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 211 HP | 68 HP |
Top Speed | 235 km/hour | 155 km/hour |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 9 seconds | 13.5 seconds |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4900 mm | 3580 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2360 mm |