1999 Opel Omega vs. 2010 Saturn Outlook
To start off, 2010 Saturn Outlook is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Opel Omega. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Opel Omega would be higher. At 5,665 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Opel Omega is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Opel Omega (311 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 34 more horse power than 2010 Saturn Outlook. (277 HP @ 6400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Opel Omega should accelerate faster than 2010 Saturn Outlook.
Because 1999 Opel Omega is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 Opel Omega. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Saturn Outlook, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Opel Omega (459 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 206 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Saturn Outlook. (253 Nm @ 5500 RPM). This means 1999 Opel Omega will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Saturn Outlook.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Opel Omega | 2010 Saturn Outlook | |
| Make | Opel | Saturn |
| Model | Omega | Outlook |
| Year Released | 1999 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5665 cc | 3564 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 311 HP | 277 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6400 RPM |
| Torque | 459 Nm | 253 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 8 seats |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1990 mm |
