1999 Opel Omega vs. 2012 Nissan Micra
To start off, 2012 Nissan Micra is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Opel Omega. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Opel Omega would be higher. At 2,198 cc (4 cylinders), 1999 Opel Omega is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Opel Omega (142 HP) has 63 more horse power than 2012 Nissan Micra. (79 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Opel Omega should accelerate faster than 2012 Nissan Micra.
Because 1999 Opel Omega is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 Opel Omega. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Nissan Micra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Opel Omega (210 Nm) has 102 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Nissan Micra. (108 Nm). This means 1999 Opel Omega will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Nissan Micra.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Opel Omega | 2012 Nissan Micra | |
| Make | Opel | Nissan |
| Model | Omega | Micra |
| Year Released | 1999 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 2198 cc | 1200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 142 HP | 79 HP |
| Torque | 210 Nm | 108 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4900 mm | 3780 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1666 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1514 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2740 mm | 2449 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 46 L |
