1999 Opel Omega vs. 2012 Volvo S60
To start off, 2012 Volvo S60 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Opel Omega. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Opel Omega would be higher. At 5,665 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Opel Omega is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Opel Omega weights approximately 81 kg more than 2012 Volvo S60.
Because 1999 Opel Omega is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 Opel Omega. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Volvo S60, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Volvo S60 (3,200 Nm) has 2741 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Opel Omega. (459 Nm). This means 2012 Volvo S60 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Opel Omega.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Opel Omega | 2012 Volvo S60 | |
Make | Opel | Volvo |
Model | Omega | S60 |
Year Released | 1999 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5665 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 311 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 459 Nm | 3200 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1690 kg | 1609 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4900 mm | 4628 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1864 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1483 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2740 mm | 2776 mm |