1999 Pontiac Bonneville vs. 1983 Zastava 102
To start off, 1999 Pontiac Bonneville is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Pontiac Bonneville is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Pontiac Bonneville (240 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 191 more horse power than 1983 Zastava 102. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Pontiac Bonneville should accelerate faster than 1983 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Pontiac Bonneville weights approximately 977 kg more than 1983 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1999 Pontiac Bonneville (380 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 285 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Zastava 102. (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1999 Pontiac Bonneville will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Zastava 102.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Pontiac Bonneville | 1983 Zastava 102 | |
Make | Pontiac | Zastava |
Model | Bonneville | 102 |
Year Released | 1999 | 1983 |
Engine Size | 3791 cc | 1299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 240 HP | 49 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 380 Nm | 95 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Vehicle Weight | 1747 kg | 770 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5150 mm | 3500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 2160 mm |