1999 Renault Clio vs. 1965 Volkswagen 1500
To start off, 1999 Renault Clio is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Volkswagen 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Volkswagen 1500 would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Renault Clio weights approximately 5 kg more than 1965 Volkswagen 1500.
Because 1965 Volkswagen 1500 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Volkswagen 1500. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Renault Clio | 1965 Volkswagen 1500 | |
| Make | Renault | Volkswagen |
| Model | Clio | 1500 |
| Year Released | 1999 | 1965 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 52 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 935 kg | 930 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3780 mm | 4200 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2410 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 7.2 L/100km | 6.5 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 40 L |
