1999 Renault Clio vs. 1966 Volvo 144
To start off, 1999 Renault Clio is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Volvo 144. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Volvo 144 would be higher. At 1,986 cc (4 cylinders), 1966 Volvo 144 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Volvo 144 (124 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 65 more horse power than 1999 Renault Clio. (59 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1966 Volvo 144 should accelerate faster than 1999 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Volvo 144 weights approximately 410 kg more than 1999 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1966 Volvo 144 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Volvo 144. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1966 Volvo 144 (167 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 74 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Renault Clio. (93 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1966 Volvo 144 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Renault Clio | 1966 Volvo 144 | |
| Make | Renault | Volvo |
| Model | Clio | 144 |
| Year Released | 1999 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1149 cc | 1986 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 124 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 93 Nm | 167 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 69.1 mm | 89 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 76.8 mm | 80 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.6:1 | 10.5:1 |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 880 kg | 1290 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3780 mm | 4630 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1730 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2620 mm |
