1999 Renault Clio vs. 1968 Toyota Century
To start off, 1999 Renault Clio is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Toyota Century. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Toyota Century would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Toyota Century weights approximately 765 kg more than 1999 Renault Clio.
Because 1968 Toyota Century is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Toyota Century. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Renault Clio | 1968 Toyota Century | |
| Make | Renault | Toyota |
| Model | Clio | Century |
| Year Released | 1999 | 1968 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 127 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 935 kg | 1700 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3780 mm | 4990 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1900 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2870 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 60 L |
