1999 Renault Clio vs. 1971 ZIL 114

To start off, 1999 Renault Clio is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 ZIL 114. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 ZIL 114 would be higher. At 6,959 cc (8 cylinders), 1971 ZIL 114 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1971 ZIL 114 (296 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 190 more horse power than 1999 Renault Clio. (106 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1971 ZIL 114 should accelerate faster than 1999 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1971 ZIL 114 weights approximately 2180 kg more than 1999 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1971 ZIL 114 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1971 ZIL 114. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1971 ZIL 114 (581 Nm @ 2900 RPM) has 433 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Renault Clio. (148 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 1971 ZIL 114 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Renault Clio.

Compare all specifications: