1999 Renault Clio vs. 1984 Toyota Cressida
To start off, 1999 Renault Clio is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Toyota Cressida. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Toyota Cressida would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1984 Toyota Cressida weights approximately 235 kg more than 1999 Renault Clio.
Because 1984 Toyota Cressida is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1984 Toyota Cressida. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Renault Clio | 1984 Toyota Cressida | |
Make | Renault | Toyota |
Model | Clio | Cressida |
Year Released | 1999 | 1984 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 104 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 935 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3780 mm | 4650 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2650 mm |