1999 Renault Clio vs. 1989 Ford Falcon
To start off, 1999 Renault Clio is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Ford Falcon would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1989 Ford Falcon weights approximately 485 kg more than 1999 Renault Clio.
Because 1989 Ford Falcon is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1989 Ford Falcon. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Renault Clio | 1989 Ford Falcon | |
Make | Renault | Ford |
Model | Clio | Falcon |
Year Released | 1999 | 1989 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 120 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 935 kg | 1420 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3780 mm | 4820 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2800 mm |